V-chips that will automatically censor violence... TV ratings systems that categorize what one sees on the tube into appropriate age groups... Why is it one doesn't come across anything like this when traveling in other countries? What is it that makes Americans so prone to inflict censorship upon themselves in the name of 'saving the children'? American society would be much better served by teaching children, and reminding adults, that what they see on television is simply not real... and by instilling in all its citizenry the mental tools with which to deconstruct mass media. Television is nothing more than a box in your living room, bedroom, kitchen, classroom, pub... wherever. It glows and makes noise when it's on and it does nothing but take up space when it's off... that is the reality of TV. Your household pets know this better than anyone and, as a result, they are probably in better touch with the true nature of broadcast media than most humans are.
If all that people see and learn from interacting with computers is 'virtual reality,' then the TV experience is best described as UNreality. American citizens take TV far too seriously and seem to lump what they see and know from their actual lives with what they have passively 'learned' from television. When my sister recently returned to the states after a TV-less year
and a half in Denmark (her first major separation from the tube),
she noticed how frequently her friends here at home talked about the
TV... they talked about the "new season of this" or "last
week's episode of that". TV has become a family member when it
should be viewed strictly as an appliance, with no more emotional
weight than a toaster. How many times have you heard someone say (or
said yourself), "I saw it on the news..." "I watched
this really great PBS documentary..." or "Did you catch
Seinfeld last night?" Socially speaking, people do need to share
common experiences but, c'mon, TV sitcoms? TV is not real. The sex, the laughter, the violence, the tears, the news, the commercials (especially the commercials)... all of this is UNreality. No matter how much you are stirred or enraged by a program's content, you are merely sitting in front of a glowing box in your living room... that is the reality, that is the extent of your 'experience'. "But wait!" you say. "The news IS real!"
This is actually not true. The news is reality filtered into unreality,
step by step, by dozens of people. Decisions are made as to where the
camera will be pointed and what will end up in the final edited presentation.
These decisions are made by people whose faces you'll likely never see.
This is not a conspiracy, it's just a series of professions... you can
learn the names of these people by reading the credits at the end of
any show. Your reality does not have a producer, an editor, a writer, a cameraperson or a news anchor. Just walk down the street you live on and you will notice that none of these people are creating your surroundings for you, nor are they commenting on them, interpreting them for you as you go, or cutting away to loud, obnoxious commercials.
Even cinema verite is not real. Simply put, cinema verite is a type of filmmaking in which the camera records a naturally occurring scene from beginning to end sans editing, commentary, rehearsal... allowing the scene to unfold naturally whichever direction it may go. This does seem like real life, and is probably as close as visual media gets to reality, however the camera is still pointing one direction and all other surroundings are obscured. It doesn't take much effort to spot the difference
between everyday reality and media unreality. Yet this concept is rarely
taught in public school. Some form of 'media scrutiny' should be a required
course from kindergarten on. Regularly teaching mass media deconstruction
skills to American children, (the earlier the better), would be far
more beneficial to American society than any censorship chip or banal
rating system. Intense media scrutiny courses can be found at the college level, but only if that's the path a student chooses for his or herself... assuming he or she can afford, or get accepted to, a college. What happens to the millions of non-college educated Americans who never learn to examine TV critically? Attempts to deal with issues of TV violence in a non-academic
manner are bad news. V-chips are dangerous for such technology represents
a gross form of censorship, if not outright government intrusion into
our lives. Silly rating systems displaying numbers and letters at the
beginning of programs are dangerous because, at best, they attempt to
dumb an audience down and, at worst, they acclimate viewers to a morality
scale decided upon by corporate capitalists, the same people who are
trying to sell them things like soda pop and bubble gum... stuff nobody
needs. Assuming TV isn't going away, all America really needs is a majority population of critical TV watchers, possessing proper mental tools with which to deconstruct the media barrage they swim through daily. |
1997 © Raptorial Media